i would unironaically suck your juicy cock off. i dotn care what you look like irl. even if you looked like Ed from 90 day fiance i would do it. i just know that youre fuckign ales fuckign underscore. and thats hwy i want to suck you off. on my knees taking it. waiting for you to explode all over my face.
Submitted by:AdmiralBulldog
ales_
i would unironaically suck your juicy cock off. i dotn care what you look like irl. even if you looked like Ed from 90 day fiance i would do it. i just know that youre fuckign ales fuckign underscore. and thats hwy i want to suck you off. on my knees taking it. waiting for you to explode all over my face.
For judges reading this that think I’m wrong, I’d love to know your thoughts on all of the following: do you default to text or spirit of the interp? What’s your default threshold for reasonability? Have you debated, and won a 1ar in a circuit LD or Policy round with a qualified circuit judge? Does competing interps require an explicit counterinterp? Is terminal defense sufficient under competing interpretations? Should counterinterps and interps be read in constructives, or rebuttals (and can I expect debaters to understand my preferences going into the round)? Why are RVIs considered illegitimate in policy? What’s the difference between T and theory? Have you only ever witnessed fewer than five theory debates? Is this the first theory debate you’re adjudicating? What is metatheory? Does metatheory come before theory (why or why not)? What should you do if theory is read without voters? What is a theory voter? If you could not answer any of these questions, or answered no, I BEG YOU: be honest with yourself. It is admirable to admit your own limitations, and to simply put in your paradigm – “I will not vote on theory because I do not know how to evaluate it.” .
Submitted by:anonymous
For judges reading this that think I’m wrong, I’d love to know your thoughts on all of the following: do you default to text or spirit of the interp? What’s your default threshold for reasonability? Have you debated, and won a 1ar in a circuit LD or Policy round with a qualified circuit judge? Does competing interps require an explicit counterinterp? Is terminal defense sufficient under competing interpretations? Should counterinterps and interps be read in constructives, or rebuttals (and can I expect debaters to understand my preferences going into the round)? Why are RVIs considered illegitimate in policy? What’s the difference between T and theory? Have you only ever witnessed fewer than five theory debates? Is this the first theory debate you’re adjudicating? What is metatheory? Does metatheory come before theory (why or why not)? What should you do if theory is read without voters? What is a theory voter? If you could not answer any of these questions, or answered no, I BEG YOU: be honest with yourself. It is admirable to admit your own limitations, and to simply put in your paradigm – “I will not vote on theory because I do not know how to evaluate it.” .
suck a dick
Submitted by:anonymous
suck a dick
FUCK MODS
Submitted by:anonymous
FUCK MODS
go go reza
Submitted by:anonymous
go go reza
Lamborghini parked outside, it's purple like lean
Submitted by:anonymous
Lamborghini parked outside, it's purple like lean
Could Ben 10 transform into the pack of cigarettes my dad left for 6 years ago?
Submitted by:anonymous
Could Ben 10 transform into the pack of cigarettes my dad left for 6 years ago?
ali
Submitted by:.
.
ali
ali
Submitted by:anonymous
ali
I met a girl recently. I was really into her, and she was into me. It was the first time this has happened in such a long time. She asked what hobbies I had. I told her "I'm really into chess." She goes "Oh". She seemed upset. Then she said "I'm sorry if I've been flirting with you. I have a friend you should talk to. He might be a much better match for you. I didn't know you were gay this whole time."
Submitted by:anonymous
I met a girl recently. I was really into her, and she was into me. It was the first time this has happened in such a long time. She asked what hobbies I had. I told her "I'm really into chess." She goes "Oh". She seemed upset. Then she said "I'm sorry if I've been flirting with you. I have a friend you should talk to. He might be a much better match for you. I didn't know you were gay this whole time."
LS aka "Loves Spam" is a Twitch egirl doing ASMR by spamming his clicky keys on stream. He mains Ivern, the Green Father achieving the Rank of Diamond IV in the Korean server. He is known for his APM farming achieving godlike numbers of 500 action per minute in a game that hardly requires 60. He trade-offs this numbers with below average game mechanics and questionable gameplay knowledge.
Submitted by:imls
imls
LS aka "Loves Spam" is a Twitch egirl doing ASMR by spamming his clicky keys on stream. He mains Ivern, the Green Father achieving the Rank of Diamond IV in the Korean server. He is known for his APM farming achieving godlike numbers of 500 action per minute in a game that hardly requires 60. He trade-offs this numbers with below average game mechanics and questionable gameplay knowledge.
LS aka "Loves Spam" is a Twitch egirl doing ASMR by spamming his clicky keys on stream. He mains Ivern, the Green Father achieving the Rank of Diamond IV in the Korean server. He is known for his APM farming achieving godlike numbers of 500 action per minute in a game that hardly requires 60. He trade-offs this numbers with below average game mechanics and questionable gameplay knowledge.
Submitted by:imls
imls
LS aka "Loves Spam" is a Twitch egirl doing ASMR by spamming his clicky keys on stream. He mains Ivern, the Green Father achieving the Rank of Diamond IV in the Korean server. He is known for his APM farming achieving godlike numbers of 500 action per minute in a game that hardly requires 60. He trade-offs this numbers with below average game mechanics and questionable gameplay knowledge.